Precedents database
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – QAA – Compliance (2023) the geographical coverage of thematic analysis
QAA
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 13/10/2023 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords the geographical coverage of thematic analysis Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “21. The Register Committee noted that QAA carries out systematic thematic analysis within Scotland, sector-wide analysis in Wales, while UK-wide QAA has only carried out “The Quality Assurance of Alternative Providers: A Retrospective View”.
22. The Committee finds that the current activity is sufficient in its understanding and interpretation of the standard and therefore could not follow the panel’s judgment of partial compliance and concluded that QAA complies with ESG 3.4.
23. The Register Committee nevertheless underlines the panel’s recommendation that QAA should develop a clearer plan for thematic analyses for all of its external QA activities in all nations of the UK and publish them on its website.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – AKAST – Partial compliance (2023) publication, analysis
AKAST
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 12/12/2023 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords publication, analysis Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “14. In its last decision, the Register Committee welcomed AKAST plans for further development of its thematic analysis after an appropriate number of programme accreditation procedures have been carried out.
15. The Register Committee noted that while AKAST has taken some steps in preparing thematic analysis since its last review, i.e., initiating a process for evaluation of the peer review processes carried out by AKAST, since 2022 at the time of the review, no thematic analysis have been made available nor any kind of such analysis have been published.
16. Considering the limited progress made since the inclusion on the Register and the limited development of thematic analysis, the Register Committee concurred with the panel that AKAST complies only partially with ESG 3.4.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – AHPGS – Compliance (2024) Thematic analysis
AHPGS
Application Renewal Review Targeted, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 02/07/2024 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords Thematic analysis Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “16. In its previous decision of registration on EQAR (of 2020-03-16), the Register Committee found the agency to be partially compliant with the standard, as the publications prepared by the agency did not analyse the outcomes of the review processes.
17. Based on the analysis of the review panel, the Register Committee understood that, since its last review in 2020, the agency published several thematic analyses. Conducting additional studies is also now part of the agency’s strategic documents.
18. The Register Committee was able to follow panel’s conclusion that AHPGS is now compliant with the standard. The Committee, further highlighted the panel’s recommendation that the agency should secure adequate dissemination of its thematic analysis, keeping in mind the various target audiences.
19. For the remaining standards, the Register Committee was able to concur with the review panel's analysis and conclusion without further comments.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – A3ES – Partial compliance (2024) Inactivity in implementing thematic analyses
A3ES
Application Renewal Review Targeted, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 02/07/2024 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords Inactivity in implementing thematic analyses Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “15. The Register Committee understood from the analysis by the panel that the most recent thematic analysis published by the agency were done in 2017.Furthermore, the Committee, noted that “the agency confirmed to the panel that it does not currently have a systematic approach to conducting thematic analysis but confirmed its commitment to developing this.”
16. The Register Committee concurred with the panel that A3ES only partially complies with ESG 3.4. The Register Committee underlined the panel’s recommendation that the agency should resume conducting and publishing thematic analysis of the outcomes and findings of its external quality assurance activities.
17. For the remaining standards, the Register Committee was able to concur with the review panel's analysis and conclusion without further comments.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – VLUHR QA – Compliance (2024) Thematic analysis
VLUHR QA
Application Renewal Review Targeted, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 27/11/2024 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords Thematic analysis Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “13. In its last decision for renewal of registration (of 2020-03-16), the Register Committee found that VLUHR QA only partially fulfilled the requirements of the standard, as the agency did not publish thematic analysis based on the findings of external quality assurance activities.
14. The Register Committee learned from the panel’s analysis that VLUHR QA has completed three thematic analysis reports since their last review and the number of reports aligns with the level of activity of the agency. Additionally, thematic analysis has been integrated into VLUHR QA’s daily work and in the current Policy Plan (2023-2027).
15. Furthermore, the Register Committee understood that VLUHR QA focusses on the thematic analyses being relevant to higher education stakeholders and ministry representatives, rather than solely concentrating on the outcomes of external review results.
16. The Register Committee was able to follow panel’s conclusion that VLUHR QA is now compliant with the standard.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – AQUIB – Partial compliance (2024) Thematic analysis
AQUIB
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 27/11/2024 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords Thematic analysis Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “21. The Register Committee learned from the report that AQUIB has a Thematic Analysis Protocol for a systematic approach to conducting thematic analyses, which was adopted in 2023 and is being implemented for the first time. However, the topic of the only thematic analysis conducted so far does not incorporate the results of its external quality assurance procedures.
22. Considering that the only thematic analysis conducted by AQUIB so far is outside the scope of ESG, the Register Committee was unable to concur with the panel’s conclusion of compliance and found that AQUIB only partially complies with the standard.
23. For the remaining standards, the Register Committee was able to concur with the review panel's analysis and conclusion without further comments.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.4 Thematic analysis – ACCUA – Compliance (2024) thematic report
ACCUA
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 27/11/2024 Standard 3.4 Thematic analysis Keywords thematic report Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “20. The Register Committee learned that ACCUA has created a statistical analysis unit and produced five thematic reports since the last external review. However, as noted by the panel, out of the five reports only one can be considered as a thematic analysis in the sense of the standard, since the other four reports provided useful inputs for policy debates with regional stakeholders and for improvements in quality assurance at universities.
21. The Register Committee finds, in line with its interpretation of the standard, that the thematic analysis report in question is sufficient for achieving compliance with the standard and therefore could not follow the panel’s judgement of partial compliance and concluded that ACCUA complies with ESG 3.4.
22. The Register Committee nevertheless underlined the panel’s recommendation that the agency should devise a clear plan for thematic studies and use its evaluation reports to produce these studies.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – ECAQA – Partial compliance (2023) Infringement of the organizational independence
ECAQA
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 03/03/2023 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Infringement of the organizational independence Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “The Committee could not verify how the agency ensures its independence from its founder and found the distribution of power among stakeholders in the governing of the agency unequal. The Committee noted that the current arrangements include the possibility of
the founder or the Director General exercising their controlling stake in several regards, causing a substantial risk of an infringement on the
independence of the agency (see also interpretation 18).”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – UKÄ – Partial compliance (2021) Organizational independence; Lack of formal mechanisms for tackling conflict of interest
UKÄ
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 18/03/2021 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Organizational independence; Lack of formal mechanisms for tackling conflict of interest Panel conclusion Substantial compliance Clarification request(s) Panel (15/03/2021)
RC decision Partial compliance “Concerns about the Government's control of all major appointments remain. In particular, the way in which the Director General is selected has not been made fully transparent and it remained unclear whether the involvement of stakeholders in appointing the Advisory Board is secured in official documents. Moreover, the potential conflict of interest that the Director General could come across in their daily operations does not seem to be fully addressed through formal means by the agency.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – ACSUCYL – Partial compliance (2020) Organisational independence; Appointment of the members by minister
ACSUCYL
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 22/06/2020 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Organisational independence; Appointment of the members by minister Panel conclusion Full compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “In terms of organisational independence, the evidence presented by the panel shows that members of the Governing Board are appointed by the regional minister responsible for universities and that the Governing Board has a strong representation of its regional Government, including the Chairperson. The agency is largely dependent on the regional Government also for the approvals and hiring of new staff and the annual approval of its budget. ”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – ANECA – Compliance (2018) Organisational independence
ANECA
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 11/09/2018 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Organisational independence Panel conclusion Full compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “The Register Committee noted that since its last evaluation, ANECA has strengthened its independence i.e. becoming an autonomous public body, ensuring a more balanced representations in its Governing Council, appointing of its own director and operating with full fiscal autonomy. The Register Committee further noted that “the operation of ANECA’s policies and procedures surrounding the design, implementation and reporting on all the evaluation processes takes place in a fully independent and autonomous manner” (Review report, p. 26).”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – ANQA – Compliance (2017) operational independence
ANQA
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 20/06/2017 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords operational independence Panel conclusion Full compliance Clarification request(s) Panel (15/03/2025)
RC decision Compliance “The Register Committee sought and received clarification from the panel as regards ANQA's independence in defining its own procedures and methods. The Committee appreciated the panel's explanation as to how ANQA developed its Manual independently.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – AEQES – Compliance (2017) organisational and operational independence
AEQES
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 20/06/2017 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords organisational and operational independence Panel conclusion Full compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “The review panel was satisfied that the 2014 decree on AEQES and the current organisational status and structure sufficiently demonstrate and safeguard AEQES independence. In particular, AEQES gained the ability to hire staff from its own budget, independently of the Ministry”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – THEQC – Partial compliance (2023) Infringement of the operational independence
THEQC
Application Initial Review Focused, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 03/03/2023 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Infringement of the operational independence Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “Dependency of the agency on staff paid by higher education institutions”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – ECCE – Partial compliance (2023) Overlapping responsibilities between different bodies/ Lack of diversity
ECCE
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 30/06/2023 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Overlapping responsibilities between different bodies/ Lack of diversity Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “34. The panel raised issues related to the high involvement of representatives of accredited institutions, amplified by the small size of the chiropractic community, as well as the overlapping responsibilities between different agency bodies. In particular, the panel regarded critically the ex-officio mutual memberships of the Executive Committee and QAAC chairperson in the respective other committee, the involvement of both bodies in the QA process and the close involvement of the QAAC in pre-screening self-evaluation reports.
35. In light of these concerns, the Register Committee concurred with the panel’s conclusion that ECCE only partially complies with the standard.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – CAAAE – Partial compliance (2023) Operational independence; Independence of formal outcomes
CAAAE
Application Initial Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 13/10/2023 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Operational independence; Independence of formal outcomes Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Partial compliance “The Committee learned that both the president and the vice president
of KAZSEE have voting rights in the two bodies in which they are members
of, i.e. the Accreditation Council and the Supervisory Board. In panel’s view
the “mixture of roles [of the President and the vice President] could make
the [decision making] system vulnerable”. The Committee could follow panel’s reasoning that the current
arrangements could pose threat for the operational independence and the
independence of formal outcomes.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – NCEQE – Non-compliance (2024) High level of involvement of the Government of Georgia in the selection of candidates for several leadership and managerial positions in the agency
NCEQE
Application Renewal Review Full, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 27/11/2024 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords High level of involvement of the Government of Georgia in the selection of candidates for several leadership and managerial positions in the agency Panel conclusion Partial compliance Clarification request(s) Panel (28/05/2024)
RC decision Non-compliance “The Register Committee found that the agency remains having weak
organisational independence as the government persists having strong involvement in the appointment of several NCEQE’s bodies. The Committee found that further panel insight should asses whether the Government’s significant involvement in the agency’s operations affects the notable staff overturn (i.e. the operational independence) and the final conclusions of the accreditation decisions (i.e. the independence of formal outcomes).”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – SKVC – Compliance (2022) involvement of ministry in accreditation of HEIs in exile
SKVC
Application Renewal Review Targeted, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 25/10/2022 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords involvement of ministry in accreditation of HEIs in exile Panel conclusion Compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “15. The review panel noted some concerns about the process of ex-post accreditation of higher education institutions in exile, especially given the direct involvement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the evaluation, i.e. certain standards being assessed by the Ministry instead of the panel of experts.
16. The Register Committee considered that the rationale might lie in the obvious political and diplomatic dimensions involved and that this might justify distributed responsibilities in principle. The Committee, however, considered that it must be transparent to the public what is an assessment made by SKVC and its independent expert panels, and what part of the assessment is made by the Ministry, potentially taking into account political considerations. The Committee recommends that SKVC and the Ministry explore how to disentangle political/diplomatic considerations and quality assessments fully, e.g. by having the Ministry make a separate assessment and decision either preceding SKVC's quality assessment, or following a decision by SKVC.
17. Given the rare occurrence of these procedures and the brief analysis by the panel on the matter, the Register Committee was unable to draw a definitive conclusion; the independence and transparency in these procedures should thus receive close attention in SKVC's next review.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – AQU – Compliance (2022) composition of governing bodies; independence of the appeals process; financial independence
AQU
Application Renewal Review Targeted, coordinated by ENQA Decision of 25/10/2022 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords composition of governing bodies; independence of the appeals process; financial independence Panel conclusion Full compliance Clarification request(s) – RC decision Compliance “In its previous decision the Register Committee underlined the concerns of the panel with regard to the overlap in the composition of the agency’s different bodies. The review panel found that AQU has separated the membership of its strategic and oversight bodies from its specific commissions and review panels. The Register Committee welcomed these changes, including the appointment of two non-local members to the Appeals Committee, but noted that the Chair of the Appeals Committee is a member of the Governing Board. While the role of the members in the Governing Board is limited to the strategic decision-making and management of the organisation, the Register Committee found that the involvement of a representative of the Board (in particular as a Chair) in the Appeals Committee might put undue pressure in the discussion and decision-making of the Appeals Committee. The Register Committee nevertheless agreed that the Appeals Committee was sufficiently independent given that the AQU’s Governing Board does not adopt the reports or decisions that are being appealed. The Register Committee further noted that AQU’s funding comes primarily from the Government of Catalonia (about 90% of the agency’s budget) and is allocated on an annual basis. The Committee welcomed AQU’s plans to move to a four-year contract with the Government of Catalonia, which could further improve its operational independence. Considered the steps taken to separate the membership of the agency’s strategic and oversight bodies, the Register Committee could follow the panel’s conclusion that AQU now complies with the standard ESG 3.3.”
Full decision: see agency register entry
-
3.3 Independence – AKAST – Compliance (2021) Independence of formal outcomes
AKAST
Application Initial Review Focused, coordinated by GAC Decision of 12/12/2021 Standard 3.3 Independence Keywords Independence of formal outcomes Panel conclusion Substantial compliance Clarification request(s) Agency (07/12/2021)
RC decision Compliance “In its past review the Register Committee noted that AKAST was subject to the vigilance of the German Bishops’ Conference and that its influence extended to giving consent for the admission of members of the association and the nomination of members of the Accreditation Committee, the confirmation of the Chairperson of the Accreditation Committee and the Board, and the approval of each of the accreditation decision by the member of the Commission for Science and Arts (Commission VIII) of the German Bishops’ Conference. Due to these interlinkages, the Register Committee concluded (see decision of 30/11/2019) that AKAST did not comply with ESG 3.3. The Register Committee in particular found the requirement that each accreditation decision requires the consent of the representative of the German Bishops’ Conference (member of the Accreditation Committee) to be in contrast with the requirement of the ESG that the responsibility for the final outcomes of the quality assurance processes remain the responsibility of the quality assurance agency. While the German Bishops’ Conference continues to play a strong role in the governance of the agency, i.e. confirming the person who chairs the Executive Board, the Accreditation Committee and the Advisory Board, the Register Committee welcomes the steps taken by AKAST to strengthen the independence of formal outcomes and of its operation While the German Bishops’ Conference continues to play a strong role in the governance of the agency, i.e. confirming the person who chairs the Executive Board, the Accreditation Committee and the Advisory Board, the Register Committee welcomes the steps taken by AKAST to strengthen the independence of formal outcomes and of its operation While the German Bishops’ Conference continues to play a strong role in the governance of the agency, i.e. confirming the person who chairs the Executive Board, the Accreditation Committee and the Advisory Board, the Register Committee welcomes the steps taken by AKAST to strengthen the independence of formal outcomes and of its operation”
Full decision: see agency register entry