Report summary
During the external evaluation process of the study program, we evaluated the study
program according to five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. We identified strengths in
three standards, such as coaching for students and strong encouragement (including
financial coverage) for participation in conferences both domestically and internationally.
For two standards (standards 2 and 3), we identified opportunities for improvement, which
are also mentioned in the report.
For standards 1 and 4, however, we identified some major deficiencies or non-compliances,
relating to the following:
• Deficiencies in the content of the program self-evaluation.
• It is necessary to regulate the admission requirements for individual subjects.