Report summary
A group of independent experts inspected the operation of the institution, examined the
available documentation, and after analyzing all the materials and conducting interviews
with various groups of stakeholders, gave their opinion on how to further improve the
already established quality assurance processes within the framework of realistic
capabilities. Progress has been noted in many areas since the last accreditation,
the faculty is growing and progressing in every aspect, even establishing new practices. We also drew
attention to opportunities in those areas where some deficiencies were detected. Some of
these areas, which according to experts should be given more attention in the future, are,
for example, in certain areas of internal organization, a not completely completed circle of
quality, material conditions, scientific research work and personnel. Thus, for example,
even more active promotion, motivation and setting of individual goals to strengthen the
scientific research work of employed and external lecturers is desirable, as well as the
planning and growth of quality publications in journals with a high impact factor. It would
be recommendable for the Institute to decide on a higher percentage of employed lecturers
and less reliance on contract employees. It would also be good to ensure that students and
other stakeholders are familiar with the results of self -evaluation reports and measures.
Greater participation of all stakeholders in the process of building quality, discussion of
results and awareness of the course and importance of these processes is necessary. It
would also be necessary to expand the range of available databases of scientific journals.