University of Ljubljana
Univerza v Ljubljani
Basic information
-
Identifiers
- DEQARINST2799
- SI0001
- SI-ETER.BAS.NATID: 33
- Erasmus: SI LJUBLJA01
- SCHAC: uni-lj.si
- Erasmus-Charter: E10209243
- EU-PIC: 999923240
- EU-VAT: SI54162513
- WHED: IAU-020664
Erasmus Institution Code
Identifier assigned by the European Commission to higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data harvested from ETER/OrgRegSCHema for Academia
Internet domain (DNS)-based identifier of institutions, used in several European initiatives for data exchange in the education and research sector, e.g. Emrex - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIErasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE)
Application number related to the ECHE, required for higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIParticipant Identification Code (PIC)
A PIC is assigned to legal entities participating in EU-funded programmes - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIEU VAT number
Identifier of economic operators for value-added tax (VAT) within the EU system, assigned by their national authority - data acquired using the EU participant register APIIAU World Higher Education Database (WHED)
Identifier used in the world-wide WHED database of higher education institutions, managed by the International Association of Universities (IAU) - data harvested from ETER/OrgReg -
Provider typehigher education institution
-
Legal seat(s)Ljubljana, Slovenia
-
Further location(s)
-
Website
-
Founding year1919
-
QF-EHEA levelsthird cycle, second cycle, first cycle
-
Permalink
National External Quality Assurance Requirements
-
Accreditation of a study programme
is granted for an indefinite period or the application is denied. -
Re-accreditation of a higher education institution
is granted for a period of maximum five years (or less) or, if quality standards are not meet the accreditation is denied. -
Initial accreditation of a higher education institutions
is granted for a period of five years or, if quality standards are not meet, the application is denied. -
Accreditation of changes of higher education institutions
Changes to another type, merger by acquisition, merger by the formation of a new entity or division of higher education institutions, changing the location in Slovenia - Further information on external quality assurance in Slovenia
External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions
Institutional level
-
DEQAR Report ID2951
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/01/2014
-
Valid until30/09/2020
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0000033-201806
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID4809
-
Agency
-
TypeInstitutional evaluation outside Germany
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date12/02/2015
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier2015-16
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID97640
-
Agency
-
TypeInstitutional quality audits
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date24/01/2024
-
Valid until24/01/2030
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier3:2024
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID89838
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid until30/09/2027
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26
-
Verifiable Credential
Programme level
-
Other names
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING - Project Oriented Applied Programme
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor's Degree
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID53587
-
Agency
-
TypeEUR-ACE review
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/10/2018
-
Valid until30/09/2025
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6364-eurace
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Other names
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING - Project Oriented Applied Programme
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor's Degree
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID53545
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/10/2018
-
Valid until30/09/2025
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6364
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Other names
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING - Research and Development Programme
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor's Degree
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID53588
-
Agency
-
TypeEUR-ACE review
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/10/2018
-
Valid until30/09/2025
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6365-eurace
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Other names
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING - Research and Development Programme
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor's Degree
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID53546
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/10/2018
-
Valid until30/09/2025
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6365
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3666
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010620105-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (univerzitetni)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3667
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010620104-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- University Bachelor
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID5272
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date25/09/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2021
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5300
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID5277
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date25/09/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2021
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5301
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- University Bachelor
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID6174
-
Agency
-
TypeEUR-ACE review
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date25/09/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2021
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5300-eurace
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID6175
-
Agency
-
TypeEUR-ACE review
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date25/09/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2021
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5301-eurace
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Second cycle graduate
-
Levelsecond cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID78145
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date24/06/2022
-
Valid until30/09/2029
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier8099
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Second cycle graduate
-
Levelsecond cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID78162
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date24/06/2022
-
Valid until30/09/2029
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier8099-eurace
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47174
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0000503-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89758
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
Finally, group of experts concluded that a number of advantages and examples of good practice characterizes both, Faculty of Theology and the analyzed study programs. On the other hand, there are some topics that should be improved in future with regard to ensure future development and better positioning of faculty and its programs in wider educational and research area. We would like to thank all those who have put efforts that this virtual visit to faculty has passed at a very high level: Mr. Klemen Subic - NAKVIS expert, faculty management and all other stakeholders for constructive cooperation in interviews. Since this evaluation took place on-line, the efforts for successful implementation to all participating parties were even greater. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26-UL-TEOF
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3759
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010710222-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Prva stopnja
-
Level-
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3624
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date15/09/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010780241-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3625
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010780242-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89812
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
A group of experts in accordance with recommendations carried out the external evaluation of the Faculty of Health Sciences and the three study programs (Nursing - 1st cycle, Nursing - 2nd cycle, Laboratory Dental Prosthetics 1st - cycle) and criteria set by the Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (SQAA). Faculty meets the requirements in all five standards of assessment. The opinion of group of experts is that faculty is a wellorganized higher education institution that puts a lot of efforts in continuous improvement of all fields of its activities. As a member of the University of Ljubljana, faculty accepts all rules and regulations from the University and prescribes its own rules in accordance with them. The quality assurance system (QAS) was, until its introduction, continuously improved with consequential acceptance of quality culture and the awareness of its importance in all relevant stakeholder groups. Each year self-evaluation procedure is performed and their conclusions serve as a starting point for action plan for future period. The contents of this document is comprehensive and summarize results from surveys and interviews with all stakeholders included in all activities of the faculty. The main objectives of annual self-evaluation reports are education, research, quality assurance and management. The annual self-evaluation reports are creating by different parties (teachers and associates, departments, study program coordinators, professional support employees, and students) and every party give their opinion regarding the performance during the past period and suggestions for future one. The quality assurance committee analyses those partial reports and merge them into the final document. Afterwards, the faculty’s Senate discusses the document, gives its approval, and accepts it. All the parties included in creating the document got feedback information about conclusions of the report. The evaluation visit was performed on-line due to an epidemiological situation connected with COVID-19 pandemics. Group of experts has got from the faculty a long list of documents necessary for evaluation that, together with answers got during interviews with relevant groups of stakeholders, served as a basis for evaluation of the institution and study programs evaluated. The disadvantage of such approach was that group of experts did not have the opportunity to witness the actual material and other conditions on-site. However, the above-mentioned elements have enabled group of experts to get pretty good insight in the functioning of the faculty and its activities. The group of experts got the impression that faculty and all stakeholders involved (management, teachers and associates, professional support employees, and students) are very interested and dedicated to the performance and quality improvement of educational process. In this regard, there are well-established protocols of information flow and communication between different stakeholder groups in both, formal and informal way. However, experts think that not all of the involved stakeholders are equally familiar with all of their rights and responsibilities. Nevertheless, the overall impression is that education is performing in a successful way and that there are noticeable improvements every year. Management of the faculty encourages all the efforts in that direction. They are trying a lot to improve teaching and working conditions (including material and ICT) for both, students and employees. From previously mentioned sources, group of experts got the impression that research activity at the faculty has some challenges to deal with in the future. Although there are evidences that research activity is improving over time, experts think that high teaching burden of teachers and especially younger colleagues represents an obstacle for greater research productivity and greater inclusion of students in the research. Currently, there are 28 active projects at the faculty. Most of them are not thematically connected with the analyzed study programs. Group of experts believes that the increase in number of thematically adjusted projects is needed since their results and findings would enable greater transfer of research knowledge into the teaching process and would help the process of teaching staff renewal. Finally, group of experts concluded that a number of advantages and examples of good practice characterizes both, Faculty of Health Sciences and the analyzed study programs. On the other hand, there are some topics that should be improved in future with regard to ensure future development and better positioning of faculty and its programs in wider educational and research area. We would like to thank all those who have put efforts that this virtual visit to faculty has passed at a very high level: Mr. Klemen Šubic - NAKVIS expert, faculty management and all other stakeholders for constructive cooperation in interviews. Since this evaluation took place on-line, the efforts for successful implementation to all participating parties were even greater. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26-UL-ZF
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89812
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
A group of experts in accordance with recommendations carried out the external evaluation of the Faculty of Health Sciences and the three study programs (Nursing - 1st cycle, Nursing - 2nd cycle, Laboratory Dental Prosthetics 1st - cycle) and criteria set by the Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (SQAA). Faculty meets the requirements in all five standards of assessment. The opinion of group of experts is that faculty is a wellorganized higher education institution that puts a lot of efforts in continuous improvement of all fields of its activities. As a member of the University of Ljubljana, faculty accepts all rules and regulations from the University and prescribes its own rules in accordance with them. The quality assurance system (QAS) was, until its introduction, continuously improved with consequential acceptance of quality culture and the awareness of its importance in all relevant stakeholder groups. Each year self-evaluation procedure is performed and their conclusions serve as a starting point for action plan for future period. The contents of this document is comprehensive and summarize results from surveys and interviews with all stakeholders included in all activities of the faculty. The main objectives of annual self-evaluation reports are education, research, quality assurance and management. The annual self-evaluation reports are creating by different parties (teachers and associates, departments, study program coordinators, professional support employees, and students) and every party give their opinion regarding the performance during the past period and suggestions for future one. The quality assurance committee analyses those partial reports and merge them into the final document. Afterwards, the faculty’s Senate discusses the document, gives its approval, and accepts it. All the parties included in creating the document got feedback information about conclusions of the report. The evaluation visit was performed on-line due to an epidemiological situation connected with COVID-19 pandemics. Group of experts has got from the faculty a long list of documents necessary for evaluation that, together with answers got during interviews with relevant groups of stakeholders, served as a basis for evaluation of the institution and study programs evaluated. The disadvantage of such approach was that group of experts did not have the opportunity to witness the actual material and other conditions on-site. However, the above-mentioned elements have enabled group of experts to get pretty good insight in the functioning of the faculty and its activities. The group of experts got the impression that faculty and all stakeholders involved (management, teachers and associates, professional support employees, and students) are very interested and dedicated to the performance and quality improvement of educational process. In this regard, there are well-established protocols of information flow and communication between different stakeholder groups in both, formal and informal way. However, experts think that not all of the involved stakeholders are equally familiar with all of their rights and responsibilities. Nevertheless, the overall impression is that education is performing in a successful way and that there are noticeable improvements every year. Management of the faculty encourages all the efforts in that direction. They are trying a lot to improve teaching and working conditions (including material and ICT) for both, students and employees. From previously mentioned sources, group of experts got the impression that research activity at the faculty has some challenges to deal with in the future. Although there are evidences that research activity is improving over time, experts think that high teaching burden of teachers and especially younger colleagues represents an obstacle for greater research productivity and greater inclusion of students in the research. Currently, there are 28 active projects at the faculty. Most of them are not thematically connected with the analyzed study programs. Group of experts believes that the increase in number of thematically adjusted projects is needed since their results and findings would enable greater transfer of research knowledge into the teaching process and would help the process of teaching staff renewal. Finally, group of experts concluded that a number of advantages and examples of good practice characterizes both, Faculty of Health Sciences and the analyzed study programs. On the other hand, there are some topics that should be improved in future with regard to ensure future development and better positioning of faculty and its programs in wider educational and research area. We would like to thank all those who have put efforts that this virtual visit to faculty has passed at a very high level: Mr. Klemen Šubic - NAKVIS expert, faculty management and all other stakeholders for constructive cooperation in interviews. Since this evaluation took place on-line, the efforts for successful implementation to all participating parties were even greater. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26-UL-ZF
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Prva stopnja
-
Level-
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3420
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date19/05/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010710223-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential