University of Ljubljana
Univerza v Ljubljani
Basic information
-
Identifiers
- DEQARINST2799
- SI0001
- SI-ETER.BAS.NATID: 33
- Erasmus: SI LJUBLJA01
- SCHAC: uni-lj.si
- Erasmus-Charter: E10209243
- EU-PIC: 999923240
- EU-VAT: SI54162513
- WHED: IAU-020664
Erasmus Institution Code
Identifier assigned by the European Commission to higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data harvested from ETER/OrgRegSCHema for Academia
Internet domain (DNS)-based identifier of institutions, used in several European initiatives for data exchange in the education and research sector, e.g. Emrex - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIErasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE)
Application number related to the ECHE, required for higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIParticipant Identification Code (PIC)
A PIC is assigned to legal entities participating in EU-funded programmes - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIEU VAT number
Identifier of economic operators for value-added tax (VAT) within the EU system, assigned by their national authority - data acquired using the EU participant register APIIAU World Higher Education Database (WHED)
Identifier used in the world-wide WHED database of higher education institutions, managed by the International Association of Universities (IAU) - data harvested from ETER/OrgReg -
Provider typehigher education institution
-
Legal seat(s)Ljubljana, Slovenia
-
Further location(s)
-
Website
-
Founding year1919
-
QF-EHEA levelsthird cycle, second cycle, first cycle
-
Permalink
National External Quality Assurance Requirements
-
Accreditation of a study programme
is granted for an indefinite period or the application is denied. -
Re-accreditation of a higher education institution
is granted for a period of maximum five years (or less) or, if quality standards are not meet the accreditation is denied. -
Initial accreditation of a higher education institutions
is granted for a period of five years or, if quality standards are not meet, the application is denied. -
Accreditation of changes of higher education institutions
Changes to another type, merger by acquisition, merger by the formation of a new entity or division of higher education institutions, changing the location in Slovenia - Further information on external quality assurance in Slovenia
External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions
Institutional level
-
DEQAR Report ID2951
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/01/2014
-
Valid until30/09/2020
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0000033-201806
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID4809
-
Agency
-
TypeInstitutional evaluation outside Germany
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date12/02/2015
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier2015-16
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID97640
-
Agency
-
TypeInstitutional quality audits
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date24/01/2024
-
Valid until24/01/2030
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier3:2024
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
DEQAR Report ID89838
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid until30/09/2027
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26
-
Verifiable Credential
Programme level
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3804
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010680147-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3717
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date16/11/2017
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010590092-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47073
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0001006-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47223
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0001372-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Doctorate
-
Levelthird cycle (NQF 10)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID100036
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/09/2023
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
As a whole, the proposed third-level study program is extremely ambitious by covering a wide variety of artistic areas, so it was quite difficult to quality assess it as such, a priori - even if it is clear that the applicant is condensing such a diversity into one program also due to the reduction of the number of doctoral programs at the university. The study program positively demonstrates the pedagogical potential of action research and field-specific methods of research work, which gives the possibility of broadly covering artistic and methodological solutions within the artistic discourse, as well as in practice, especially by planned research projects. It also involves the checking of the established critical discourse and professional reflection of student's own artistic production. The relations between objectives, outcomes and competences, and the curricula content of some of the courses are not properly regulated. The optionality (elective courses system) of the study program is not clearly evident, and it is not sufficiently enabled within individual artistic areas the program is supposed to cover. In view of the integration as well as the critical reflection of technologies, the proposed study program remains only to a limited extent responsive to the current state of the art and the development trends, which are today strongly relevant in terms of artistic research and practice in each of the artistic areas. An important point in which the group of experts recognized inconsistency with the Criteria is interdisciplinarity, namely as a basic concept, which is not consistently derived or justified neither in the overall design nor in the structure and implementation planned in the submitted study program. Contributing to this inconsistency is also an important opportunity for improvement, which the group of experts decided to note in the report, namely in the optionality (electivity) of the study program, which, even after the Applicant's Response to the Preliminary Report, remained uncompleted and too formalistic to open up or support possibilities of real and actual interdisciplinarity of this program. Even after the reconsiderations, upon the Applicant's Response, the group of experts still estimates that the interdisciplinarity (incl. optionality) of the submitted program is merely of a technical nature, as it is already determined and thus narrowed through the student's choice of the track (main course) in the artistic field of the study program. Therefore the program is not about interdisciplinarity as a comprehensive and in-depth approach to the study of art or an interweaving of specialist knowledge and insights from all or several represented artistic and scientific disciplines, which would be directed towards a common artistic research focus. In practice, such an extensive and diversified program - without decisive and huge adjustments even before or immediately after its implementation start - will be very challenging to manage in a transparent and correct manner, such that would not only ensure adequate visibility of all artistic areas and offer all participants a truly high-quality academic experience, but would also from the point of view of the involved organizational units of the applicant fulfill its role in the institution's development strategy. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6033-1/2021/17
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47209
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0017181-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Prva stopnja
-
Level-
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3417
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date19/05/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010710220-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3418
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010710221-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (univerzitetni)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47123
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0000197-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47124
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0020865-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47125
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/04/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0020866-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor of Science
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID5281
-
Agency
-
TypeASIIN seal programme accreditation
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date27/03/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2020
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5107
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor of Science
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID6142
-
Agency
-
TypeEuro-Inf review
-
Statusvoluntary
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date27/03/2015
-
Valid until30/09/2020
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier5107-euroinf
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (univerzitetni)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47224
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0001373-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47253
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0017619-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (visokošolski)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47261
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0001383-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47262
-
Agency
-
TypeRe-accreditation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0001385-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89811
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date21/04/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
At the Faculty of Administration, the evaluated study programs are developed and updated in a constant communication among employees, students, management and external stakeholders. Both of the evaluated study programs have an international accreditation, which has led to the modernization of both study programs. At the first cycle study program a new module Governance in the European Union was introduced, and the second cycle study program was fully renewed in line with the recommendations of international accreditation, opinions of more than 1000 potential employers and with an active involvement of the academic staff and students. Students have expressed satisfaction with their studies. According to the employers, graduates possess a broad view of public administration and are highly flexible. Academic and non-teaching staff are suitably qualified and receive an adequate assistance and advice regarding their professional development. The material conditions for the implementation of the two study programs are appropriate. For students with special needs, appropriate adjustments are made to enable them to study successfully and progress regularly. Both management and employees have recognized the importance of innovative approaches to teaching and to student-centered teaching and learning. The Centre for the Development of Pedagogical Excellence is the driving force of this development. The 27 integration of innovative teaching methods is stimulated by the faculty both financially and by habilitation criteria, where points collected on the basis of training for pedagogical work are also required for each promotion. The group of experts suggests that the faculty reconsiders the enrolment conditions for the second cycle study program and defines appropriate differential exams for students from other fields on the topics that are a prerequisite for their successful study. The faculty should also follow the amount of student workload and take measures when discrepancies are identified. The faculty still has many opportunities to improve in the field of self-evaluation reports and reporting on what it is actually being done for the quality development, as quite a few analyses, evaluations and proposals for improvement are missing in the self-evaluation reports. In this respect, the team of experts has tried to give specific suggestions in order to help the faculty in the further development of the system and culture of quality. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2019/26-UL-FU
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Phd
-
Levelthird cycle (NQF 10. raven (10))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3601
-
Agency
-
TypeAccreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date15/12/2016
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0010700149-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
-
Qualification/award
- Doctorate
-
Levelthird cycle (NQF 10)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89508
-
Agency
-
TypeExtraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date20/10/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Summary
Report summary
The joint dosctoral study program Governance and Economics in the Public Sector was evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria and according to Criteria for International Cooperation in Higher Education. For the four standards, we identified advantages, such as the example of good practice with the introduction of Commissions for monitoring the progress of doctoral students, which monitor the research work of the doctoral student from the first year of study onwards. Similarly, we assess 25 very positively that additional incentives for students have been introduced in order to promote students' scientific research work, such as co-financing registration fees at scientific conferences for doctoral students. Students and graduates also highly praised the communication and the ongoing solution of all content, research and other problems or issues, with the coordinator of the doctoral study program at the Faculty of Public Administration, prof.dr. Klun. We have identified a few other advantages, which we list in full in the report. For the three standards, we identified opportunities for improvement, which are also described in the report. In Standard 2, we identified one partial compliance with the standard, namely the need to establish closer active and balanced cooperation of both partner institutions in all areas related to the self-evaluation of the study program, at all levels of the self-evaluation cycle, in accordance with the Consortium Agreement. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6034-1/2022/14
-
Verifiable Credential