Ljubljana School of Business
B2 Visoka šola za poslovne vede, zavod
Basic information
-
Identifiers
- DEQARINST2371
- SI0064
- SI-ETER.BAS.NATID: 13
- Erasmus: SI LJUBLJA30
- SCHAC: vspv.si
- Erasmus-Charter: E10118970
- EU-PIC: 939892365
- EU-VAT: 87421755
- WHED: IAU-022411
Erasmus Institution Code
Identifier assigned by the European Commission to higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data harvested from ETER/OrgRegSCHema for Academia
Internet domain (DNS)-based identifier of institutions, used in several European initiatives for data exchange in the education and research sector, e.g. Emrex - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIErasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE)
Application number related to the ECHE, required for higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIParticipant Identification Code (PIC)
A PIC is assigned to legal entities participating in EU-funded programmes - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI APIEU VAT number
Identifier of economic operators for value-added tax (VAT) within the EU system, assigned by their national authority - data acquired using the EU participant register APIIAU World Higher Education Database (WHED)
Identifier used in the world-wide WHED database of higher education institutions, managed by the International Association of Universities (IAU) - data harvested from ETER/OrgReg -
Provider typehigher education institution
-
Legal seat(s)Ljubljana, Slovenia
-
Website
-
Founding year2012
-
QF-EHEA levelssecond cycle, first cycle
-
Permalink
National External Quality Assurance Requirements
-
Accreditation of a study programme
is granted for an indefinite period or the application is denied. -
Re-accreditation of a higher education institution
is granted for a period of maximum five years (or less) or, if quality standards are not meet the accreditation is denied. -
Initial accreditation of a higher education institutions
is granted for a period of five years or, if quality standards are not meet, the application is denied. -
Accreditation of changes of higher education institutions
Changes to another type, merger by acquisition, merger by the formation of a new entity or division of higher education institutions, changing the location in Slovenia - Further information on external quality assurance in Slovenia
External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions
Institutional level
Institutional re-accreditation
-
DEQAR Report ID2983
-
Agency
-
Type
- Re-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date20/04/2017
-
Valid until30/09/2022
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0000013-201806
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Institutional re-accreditation
-
DEQAR Report ID89688
-
Agency
-
Type
- Re-accreditation of higher education institutions
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date16/06/2022
-
Valid until30/09/2027
-
SummaryIn the evaluation process, the institution was evaluated according to 17 standards in the procedures for reaccreditation of the institution. We identified advantages in four of the seven standards in the field of operation of the higher education, and opportunities for improvement in all seven standards. In Standard 2, during the first evaluation visit in December 2021, we identified two major...
Report summary
In the evaluation process, the institution was evaluated according to 17 standards in the procedures for reaccreditation of the institution. We identified advantages in four of the seven standards in the field of operation of the higher education, and opportunities for improvement in all seven standards. In Standard 2, during the first evaluation visit in December 2021, we identified two major shortcomings or inconsistencies related to the composition of the senate and the academic board of the institution, which the institution eliminated until the second evaluation visit in April 2022. In both standards in the field of human resources, we identified advantages and opportunities for improvement, and in standard 6 also a major shortcoming or inconsistency related to the appointment to the title of associate professor, which was eliminated on May 23rd 2022, by the Senate decision. We identified strengths in two of the four student standards and opportunities for improvement in all four. In four standards in the field of material conditions, we found advantages in one standard and opportunities for improvement in two, as well as a major shortcoming or inconsistency in standard 17 (during the first evaluation visit in December 2021), as the library did not provide at least one copy of mandatory study literature for study units of study programs, which the institution eliminated until the second evaluation visit in April 2022. As a very good practice (excellence) we highlight the set system of obtaining information through focus groups in the internal quality system (standard 6), which has already come to life in the field of focus groups with students of all study programs, and such a system is also planned for other stakeholder groups. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2021/15
-
Verifiable Credential
Programme level
Management
(first cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (visokošolski)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47492
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date16/08/2019
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0023555-201910
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Management in informatika
(second cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3783
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0640130501-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Management in informatika
(second cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89685
-
Agency
-
Type
- Extraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date16/06/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
SummaryIn the evaluation process of the sample of study programs of the institution, we evaluated the study programs Business Informatics (higher education study program) and Management and Informatics (master study program). The study programs were evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. For four standards, we identified advantages, such as the fact that within the self-...
Report summary
In the evaluation process of the sample of study programs of the institution, we evaluated the study programs Business Informatics (higher education study program) and Management and Informatics (master study program). The study programs were evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. For four standards, we identified advantages, such as the fact that within the self-evaluation of study programs, the institution conducts two-year interviews with a focus group of students and graduates; the implementation of the study program is fully adapted to the needs of the part-time student population; student-centered education, both in terms of the way the pedagogical process is carried out and in terms of support services for students, is assessed as very positive; the possibility of obtaining certificates for students and additional courses; a well-designed interactive online classroom, which in addition to study materials also contains news about the activities of the Student Council and a forum through which up-to-date communication between school, teachers and students and a workshop on writing and using learning outcomes for higher education teachers. For all five standards, we identified opportunities for improvement, which are described in the report. For standards 1, we identified one partial shortcoming or inconsistency related to the verification and evaluation of student workloads: immediately after the evaluation visit, the institution addressed this issue regarding the undefined methodology for verifying study workloads in the Institution's Quality Rules and regarding the missing workload analysis in the self-evaluation report - after the visit the institution also changed the Rules of Procedure and the questionnaire and additionally explained that the changed procedure and questionnaire will be used in the next academic year (2022/2023). -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2021/14-programi
-
Verifiable Credential
Marketing management
(second cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47493
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date16/02/2017
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0021514-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Poslovna analitika
(first cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor
-
Levelfirst cycle
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID100035
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/09/2023
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
SummaryA group of experts has prepared a joint report on the assessment areas from Article 6 of the Criteria for Accreditation and External Evaluation of Higher Education Institutions and Study Programs, specifically the quality standards from Articles 17 and 18 of the Accreditation Criteria. Under standard 4, we identified one strength, namely the commendable organization of documentation and procedures...
Report summary
A group of experts has prepared a joint report on the assessment areas from Article 6 of the Criteria for Accreditation and External Evaluation of Higher Education Institutions and Study Programs, specifically the quality standards from Articles 17 and 18 of the Accreditation Criteria. Under standard 4, we identified one strength, namely the commendable organization of documentation and procedures governing hybrid modes of study. Based on the recommendations of the experts, the institution eliminated all the inconsistencies that were initially identified and actively approached the realization of the proposed opportunities for improvement. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6033-2/2023/9
-
Verifiable Credential
Poslovna informatika
(first cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (visokošolski)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID47494
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0015029-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Poslovna informatika
(first cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID89685
-
Agency
-
Type
- Extraordinary evaluation of study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionnot applicable
-
Date16/06/2022
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
SummaryIn the evaluation process of the sample of study programs of the institution, we evaluated the study programs Business Informatics (higher education study program) and Management and Informatics (master study program). The study programs were evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. For four standards, we identified advantages, such as the fact that within the self-...
Report summary
In the evaluation process of the sample of study programs of the institution, we evaluated the study programs Business Informatics (higher education study program) and Management and Informatics (master study program). The study programs were evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. For four standards, we identified advantages, such as the fact that within the self-evaluation of study programs, the institution conducts two-year interviews with a focus group of students and graduates; the implementation of the study program is fully adapted to the needs of the part-time student population; student-centered education, both in terms of the way the pedagogical process is carried out and in terms of support services for students, is assessed as very positive; the possibility of obtaining certificates for students and additional courses; a well-designed interactive online classroom, which in addition to study materials also contains news about the activities of the Student Council and a forum through which up-to-date communication between school, teachers and students and a workshop on writing and using learning outcomes for higher education teachers. For all five standards, we identified opportunities for improvement, which are described in the report. For standards 1, we identified one partial shortcoming or inconsistency related to the verification and evaluation of student workloads: immediately after the evaluation visit, the institution addressed this issue regarding the undefined methodology for verifying study workloads in the Institution's Quality Rules and regarding the missing workload analysis in the self-evaluation report - after the visit the institution also changed the Rules of Procedure and the questionnaire and additionally explained that the changed procedure and questionnaire will be used in the next academic year (2022/2023). -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6031-3/2021/14-programi
-
Verifiable Credential
Strateški management
(second cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Master
-
Levelsecond cycle (NQF 8)
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID115236
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date21/12/2023
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
SummaryThe Strategic Management study program addresses the business world's current requirements and expectations with the program's objectives. VŠPV will enroll employed students in the program, which lasts 2 years (120 ECTS), and the organization and method of study implementation is adapted to this. Contact hours will be held consecutively, partially synchronously and asynchronously in the afternoon....
Report summary
The Strategic Management study program addresses the business world's current requirements and expectations with the program's objectives. VŠPV will enroll employed students in the program, which lasts 2 years (120 ECTS), and the organization and method of study implementation is adapted to this. Contact hours will be held consecutively, partially synchronously and asynchronously in the afternoon. VŠPV has an exemplary defined hybrid method of study, for which the institution also has adequate material conditions. The intended providers of the study program have appropriate references and habilitation titles, although some of them have already expired since the application was submitted. Depending on the level of study, the VŠPV would benefit from professors being better integrated into the VŠPV's operation (larger share of employed professors, at least in the share of employment). The courses are interconnected horizontally and vertically, and a group of experts proposes the reorganization of compulsory and elective courses. Students cannot achieve the learning outcomes and competencies of the study program with elective courses. The second-level study program Strategic Management is suitable for graduates of non- business schools (mainly technical and natural sciences), who will thus acquire the knowledge and competences to successfully cope with the business world's demands. The group of experts, therefore, proposes a change in the planned admission conditions in the application for accreditation. The group of experts also suggests to the applicant the unification of curricula (content, learning outcomes, number of compulsory study units) and, above all, a reasonable choice of a range of teaching methods and ways of testing and assessing knowledge in a way that will be linked to subject-specific learning outcomes and competencies. The group of experts also proposes a review of the learning outcomes of individual courses and their adaptation to the level of study. -
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifier6033-4/2023/10
-
Verifiable Credential
Trženje
(degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Druga stopnja
-
Level-
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3518
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date16/02/2017
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0640130503-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential
Tržno komuniciranje in odnosi z javnostmi
(first cycle degree)
-
Qualification/award
- Bachelor (visokošolski)
-
Levelfirst cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
-
Programme typeFull recognised degree programme
-
DEQAR Report ID3785
-
Agency
-
Type
- Accreditation of new study programmes
-
Statuspart of obligatory EQA system
-
Formal decisionpositive
-
Date01/11/2013
-
Valid untilnot applicable
-
Report and decision
-
Permalink
-
Agency's identifierDEQAR-0640130504-201808
-
External link
-
Verifiable Credential